<!-----kanoodle cookies-----> <SCRIPT language="JavaScript1.1" type="text/javascript" src="http://context5.kanoodle.com/cgi-bin/ctpub_adserv.cgi?id=85039742&site_id=85039743&format=conly"></SCRIPT> <!-----kanoodle cookies-----> <body> <body bgcolor="#8F8F6B">
 

Home

StatCounter

Friday, April 15, 2005

Preach’s Monday Morning Rant

So what, it is not Monday. F. U.

Ok. So, ‘we’ have liberated women, but does equality = equality, or a simply a new way to exploit women.

Here is my case and here is my take on it.

Michelle Wie’s second attempt, and the third overall by a woman, on June 16th to make the cut at a men’s golfing event is a sad publicity stunt.

Does it benefit her monetarily? Of course it does.

Is it done because she has a legitimate chance to win or even make the cut? Of course she does not. If she did I would be rooting for her to win.

“Event director Clair Peterson said: "We expect there would be spectators here who might not come out otherwise.”

If a one armed transvestite would draw in more people and money, and not result in bad publicity they would roll him out instead of her. This is not an attempt to equalize things or see is she can win the tournament, but just a way to bring in more people on the days in which attendance is not so hot.

I do not see the difference between this and the tournament having strippers every third hole. In both cases a woman is being used to draw in attendance because they are a woman, and not because they are going to compete to win the tournament. In one case she can play golf almost as good as the men that can not compete at this level and the other one are ‘hotties’.

--

Contact SnarkySpot